20 Great Digital Publishing Ideas

For any business – publisher or otherwise — grappling with how content can be positioned, generated, harnessed or otherwise manipulated to help grow revenue, this list from Niche Magazine has to be worth a close look. While it is targeted at publishers working off an ad-driven model, it could be adapted in numerous ways to suit other business approaches.

If anyone just stops and thinks for a moment, it captures a whole load of common sense and helps answer those questions about generating sustainable digital revenue streams. But what is so appealing is actually just how simple so much of this is to do. The list was generated from attendees to this year’s Niche Digital Conference in September and polished off by some digital tinkering by Ryan Dohrn from Brain Swell Media.

#1 Exclusive advertisers: Allow one advertiser on a certain day of the month to occupy all the ad spots on each page of your entire website.

#2 Balance editorial calendar against SEO research. Use key word research tools to determine what web users are “really” searching for… then write content about those topics.

#3 Provide an RSS feed of news to advertisers with static websites. Most advertisers have dead, static sites and your content can liven them up and help them look more relevant. Use Feedburner to help.

#4 Get on board with Google+. What is your plan? Don’t play catch-up. Get ahead of the kids and figure out what Google + has to offer through their various “circles”.

#5 Create a unique incentive plan for your sales team that provides a bonus for selling online. Your margins are better in web, so pay a better commission. Or, structure a better plan for banners sold. Out of cash?  Give days off or free lunch. Get creative.

#6 Create special holiday or seasonal digital editions. From holiday gift guides to summer camp guides, take ideas and turn them into digital-only special publications. Be sure to tell advertisers how you are going to tell the public about the special digital edition.

#7 Stop giving away digital space! Just stop it!

#8 Create an e-newsletter from your sales team to your current advertisers. Create a list of your current clients and start sending out an e-newsletter. This should contain helpful hints, links to great articles, and deadline information. You can find great information about this on marketingsherpa.com, adage.com, techcrunch.com and ryandohrn.com.

#9 Use short videos to answer advertisers’ common questions. Is there a question that you are often asked by advertisers? Record an answer and create an answer archive. Keep it simple. Jing is a great tool for this type of sales tool.

#10 Spread out your content! Don’t publish all of your magazine’s content online at the beginning of the month. Use the date stamping tools of your content management system to load your content all at one, but publish it piece by piece over a period of time.

#11 Create strategic alliances to offer expanded digital services to your advertisers. Find local web designers, videographers, photographers, and other service providers. Form a creative network where you all get rewarded for referrals.

#12 Register the .tv and .mobi for your main domain. Expand your offerings!

#13 Flip it – “Buy an ad in our digital edition and get the print as added value.” This is a unique twist that may not work for everyone, but give it a try to shake things up for your sales team.

#14 Make sure you charge for social media. You should charge $75 – $125/thousand for your social media updates on your Facebook page and Twitter feed.

#15 Create e-books from magazine content. You have years of content, so put it to good use. Create e-books around a specific topic.

#16 Use a daily video tip to drive B2B sales. Advertisers like the exposure, and they are also your best experts. Have them pay to be the expert in a section on your site and record their answers to submitted questions.

#17 Create an interactive media kit. A PDF just isn’t enough. Advertisers require more stimuli than ever before to make a decision. Also, they want information NOW! http://mediakit.fastcompany.com is a great example of an online media kit.

#18 Monitor your SEO ranking and search volume monthly for key search terms. Each month you want a report that shows you where your site ranks for all the key terms that you have researched as important. Also, you want to re-run your key word research often. Raven is a good tool for this.

#19 Create a social media interaction plan.  Each day a member of your team should be assigned to monitor and reply to social media comments. Assign days and make it mandatory.

#20 Create a simple website sign-in with Facebook Connect. Make it as easy as possible for users to sign in to your web site. This is critical if you want to survey behavior or demo targeted advertising.

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

TweepsMap plots your Twitter followers across the world

Lovely little toy being pushed out there by TweepsMap. Now you can map where your Twitter followers are in the world by country or city. The results are shown on a map or broken down as a list or pie chart. Yummy. My TweepsMap is below:

TweepsMap of nhaqueoi on Twitter

Nhaqueoi's followers on Twitter across the world

Analysis of my followers tells me I’m more popular in the UK than the US, London is the key hub of my followers and I have more people interested in my tweets in Bangalore than Tokyo.

This fun app is fully integrated with Twitter (thank goodness that wasn’t overlooked) and users can tweet maps for their friends and others.

But TweepMaps is not all about mindless fun, and will have a serious application for businesses looking to measure success in Twitter campaigns targeted at specific countries or regions.

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

Mexican blogger decapitation latest threat to free speech

A sense of great sadness washed over me as I read the Wired article detailing the murder and decapitation of the moderator of a popular Mexican social media network as the country’s unstoppable descent into bloody drug-fuelled mayhem deepens. I make no excuse for the photo here, but this is the sad and inescapable truth and it should not be ignored or avoided.

Another grisly murder in Mexico

Journalists have long been in the front line in Mexico, but this case is especially unsavoury. The 35-year-old , known online as ‘Rascatripas’ or ‘Scraper’ (literally “Fiddler”), was found dumped just a few miles from the Texas border in the city of Nuevo Laredo. It was reported that under  the man’s body was a blood-stained scrawled message that translated as: “Hi I’m ‘Rascatripas’ and this happened to me because I didn’t understand I shouldn’t post things on social networks.” It is alleged he had tipped off local authorities about drug cartels.

Rascatripas was the fourth blogger or social media networker to be murdered in the town by organised drugs gangs in the past three months. A new US report says settlements along the US border are turning into ghost towns as residents flee escalating violence and brutality dished out by drug cartels. Throughout northern Mexico, civil society has “severely deteriorated”, it added.

Scary stuff.

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

EVENT – Fancy a little Meet Up?

I do. In fact, today I signed up for TheMediaBriefing’s second meet up due on December 1st at a nice little boozer just off Oxford Circus. This particular MediaSocial event is put together by (yes, you’ve guessed it) those nice folks at TheMediaBriefing who have taken time out from curating loads and loads of useful content to make sure the beer’s nice and chilled. On past experience, a great group of like-minded media people will attend and the conversation is sure to sparkle.

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

The case for a Chief Content Officer

Continuing my theme of why content is important, I wanted to share a useful slideshare presentation from Alan Porter. Self explanatory really and a great starting point for businesses looking to transform the way they engage with their customers. The poll on whether Chief Content Officers are required remains live down on the right of this page, so please vote.

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

POLL — is content important?

Of course it is. Let’s avoid the cliché about content being some kind of regal entity and instead focus on what content actually is, and what its purpose is. In the world of publishing, we need to avoid the old dusty traps of content being tied to title. Content is neutral, it is there to be sliced and diced and served up in ways which suit the needs of the reader or subscriber.

But these days it is not just the publisher that needs to consider its content strategy. Today everyone is a publisher — companies large and small, as well as individuals, are populating the web with every increasing volumes of content. If you are not part of the conversation, you may as well pack up and go home.

I will be returning to this theme, but for the moment, please answer the poll posted on the right of this article.

 Related articles

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

A Tale of Two Times’ — Digital subscription growth.

New York Times and The Times digital subscriber growth

They're growing, but not enough.

More than a year ago The Times (of London) introduced its paywall solution, followed in March this year by the New York Times. So how have they been doing?

Paid Content had this useful bit of top level analysis today. The answer, it appears, is not very well.

To quote PC:

NYTimes.com’s paid content strategy is a softer, more porous on-ramp than The Times’, operating a free story allowance before subscription is required. This may be reflected in the graph on the left.

But likely what the comparison really shows is the differing scales of the news publishers’ different addressable markets. The U.S. is larger than the UK, New York larger than London, and 12 percent of NYTimes.com’s subscriptions are coming from outside the States, while NYTCo also operates the adjacent International Herald Tribune. The Times remains a firmly British publication.

In London, it is tough times for The Times. Declining circulation, the News Corp struggles over the phone tapping scandals and an economy sliding into meltdown are doing no favours. It was reported late last week that News International was cutting 200 editorial jobs from The Times and The Sunday Times. The cuts which impact both fulltime and casual staff were the first major change under new News International Chief Executive Tom Mockridge. My guess is that more belt tightening will inevitably follow.

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

Rex & Getty — it’s off! A letter to photographers from Rex Features’ Mike Selby

Rex & Getty -- it's off!

Rex & Getty -- it's off!

These days photography is playing on my mind. As an ex-professional snapper (film, of course) I hung up my Nikons in 1999 and haven’t been back since. I’m now of a certain age where I feel that same old uncontrollable urge to have a decent camera, so I’m going digital. In all the years that I haven’t been shooting a steady trickle of royalties has continued to hit my bank account, some of which was from Rex Features. Now, Rex was the subject of a take over bid by the global giant Getty. In stepped the UK Office of Fair Trading (OFT) which felt the acquisition would be anti-competitive.

As a registered Rex photographer, on Friday Mike Selby sent out the following email:

Dear Colleagues,

As you know, on 26th April we announced Getty Images’ intention to acquire Rex Features and its associated companies in the US. Getty Images voluntarily informed the Office of Fair Trading of the intended transaction to enable the OFT to carry out an investigation in advance of the deal being completed. Following its investigation, the OFT has decided to refer the proposed transaction to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission for competition clearance.

Although the MMC may ultimately have cleared the deal, we feel that the six- to eight- month process which would be carried out by the Commission would be too disruptive and unsettling for our loyal staff and suppliers who have already had to endure weeks of uncertainty. We have therefore decided to call off the proposed merger and the acquisition will not now be going ahead.

Rex was never actively seeking a buyer, and we are not seeking one now. With the deal off we will continue to do what we have been doing all along — give photographers and photo users in the UK and around the world a service which is second to none.

The fact that the OFT had reason to refer the proposed transaction to the MMC is in itself an indication of Rex Features’ strength and confirmation of the Company’s leading position in the market. We had many calls from clients today after the decision, welcoming the news and the fact that Rex is going to continue to be there as their independent picture source of choice.

Our staff have been working as normal all through this period and we will continue to work as hard as ever, to compete effectively with our many industry rivals, and to build on the more than half a century of history and reputation with which the name Rex Features is synonymous.

We would like to thank you for your patience, loyalty and support over the past few weeks in particular and look forward to a successful and long-lasting relationship.

With best regards,

John, Mike & Sue Selby and Martin Hillier

8 July 2010

Rex Features Ltd

18 Vine Hill

London

EC1R 5DZ

UK

Tel: +44-(0)20-7278 7294

Fax: +44-(0)20-7837 4812

www.rexfeatures.com

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

Times Online tells staff its paywall nearing rollout. Roll up for trials.

So here it comes. The Times Online paywall is set to be launched. Thanks to our friends at paidContent:UK for Stephen Brook’s posting today that reported News International Chief Executive Rebekah Brooks told staff that readers registered with Times Online will be invited to register for an “exclusive preview of the new digital proposition” this week.

Let me not just repeat Brook’s posting. Go over and have a look for yourself. However, I will repeat the memo reportedly sent to News International staff today, and which will be distributed to Times Online registered users.

FAIR PRICING FOR DIGITAL CONTENT

Message from Rebekah Brooks
Those of you that subscribe to The Times and The Sunday Times or have registered on Times Online will receive a communication starting from this week inviting you to register for an exclusive preview of the new digital proposition. This shows that we are getting closer to the launch of the titles’ new digital sites.
I have made no secret of our intention to start charging for quality journalism online.  As you may have seen speculation in the media about our plans, I wanted to take this opportunity to let you know why we believe this is such an important development.
We are committed to producing quality journalism that is written by professionals with a profound understanding of their subject and a commitment to provide well-informed coverage of the issues. Each of our titles, in its own way, has pioneered quality, professional journalism and we are unashamed to say we believe it has value.
In contrast, the industry is making the mistake of chasing millions of unique users by giving the audience more and more content for free. An obsession with traffic just doesn’t pay.

Great journalism needs investment and we are committed to supporting the fantastic work that you are all producing and delivering to our audiences. It is the quality of the journalism that you create, and the ways in which we produce and distribute it, that will continue to set our titles apart from the competition.
And to be clear, when we talk about charging for our content online, we are talking about charging a fair price. Price alone will not be a barrier to take up.  Of course, we expect to see the numbers of unique users of our sites come down dramatically. But the people who register to our new digital products will be customers who have made a positive decision to pay a fair price for journalism that they value, and they will be those who are more committed to and engaged with our titles.
This is an exciting development for our company especially as we will be among the first in the world to take this step. There are many who declare we have set ourselves an impossible task. But our company loves nothing more than challenging the status quo.
Shortly I will update you on our plans in more detail. But, in the meantime, I believe that with the combined force of your talent, commitment and hard work, we will, in the months and years to come, define a new future in the way we create, deliver and profit from our journalism.
Rebekah Brooks
Chief Executive, News International

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

The New York Times in high stakes plans to charge online. Draconian, desperate or inspired?

New York Times to charge for online access from 2011. Photo: Andy Soloman

Has the bullet been bitten? Or is the bullet winging its way to the heart of its mark?

The announcement by top US newspaper, The New York Times, that starting January 2011 it will charge frequent users of its website has either been heralded by underfire newspaper execs, or derided as a desperate measure that will hasten the venerable institution’s demise.

The NYT‘s David Carr, in the Times’ Media Decoder blog, said the move represented a hedge.

People who remain reflexively bullish on free [content] ignore the fact that the clock is ticking on many of the legacy businesses that produce that content. The new approach is an effort to replace that ticking clock with a meter, and its success is not assured but to sit still would be dumb.

It is not the job of The New York Times or any other mainstream media company to give away its content until it can no longer afford to do so.

The charging plans appear fairly draconian. From next January visitors will be able to view a few articles free each month, but step over the threshold and they will be required to pay a flat fee for unlimited access. Subscribers to the daily or Sunday print editions will continue to receive full access.

The NYT has yet to say how much it intends to charge, or how many articles will remain free each month.

Newspapers have been grappling with plummeting circulations and advertising revenues. Readers have increasingly turned away from being brand loyal to being increasingly varied in choosing how they access their general news. The Internet, RSS feeds or news aggregators are able to through up numerous sources to information on any particular news story.

Yes, gathering news is an expensive business, but increasingly readers have been opting for free services to keep up with developments. As circulations decline, so advertisers look elsewhere. It’s worth noting that the the New York Times Company, which also includes the International Herald Tribune and 15 other daily newspapers, saw advertising revenue plunge 30% in the first nine months of 2009.

No doubt, this is a brave move by the NYT, but with technology, reader behaviour and news sources exploding by the month (think Twitter and other social networks, think of the boom in citizen journalism, and think cost) it is hard to see whether come next January the NYT is part of a crowd rushing to harvest online dollars or whether it finds itself back tracking as the “loyal” online  readers it wants to monetise dessert it for somewhere else.

As Reuters media reporter Felix Salmon wrote (and which was reported in the NYT):

Successful media companies go after audience first, and then watch revenues follow; failing ones alienate their audience in an attempt to maximize short-term revenues.”

So, is the NYT going to charge into battle only to find its followers have quietly disappeared? Will its brazen war cry fade into a garbled mumble? Or has it struck gold? My take is that it is not enough for legacy newspaper businesses to think they can easily transfer the model into a successful online business. They need to find ways to serve up the exclusive essential information that people will be willing to pay for.

This isn’t the first time the NYT has charged for acces. Back in the 1990s it charged overseas readers and then again a few years ago it tried another scheme to charge poeple for reading the op-ed columns. Both failed to gain any significant traction and were dropped.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

News International confirms banning NewsNow crawlers from linking

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive O...

Image via Wikipedia

Following on from my earlier post that The Times Online had barred aggregator NewsNow.co.uk from crawling its website, it seems News International as a whole has the bit firmly between its teeth and has also banned the linking service from crawling any of its newspaper sites including including The Sun Online and the News of the World.

The Guardian reported News International as saying:

“We’ve been in communication with NewsNow for several months. We asked them to remove our content repeatedly from their indexing,” said a News International spokesperson. “Now, we will update our files accordingly for all our titles.”

“NewsNow has been using Times Online content as part of its paid-for, commercial as well as free services. They have continued to do so despite our direct requests for them to stop. As a result, we have taken the decision to disallow their indexing of our content,” the company said in a statement.

“News International makes a significant investment in journalism and we believe that it is entirely appropriate for us to ask that our rights are respected. NewsNow has acknowledged that they require our permission to use our content and, in the absence of our permission, has ceased to do so.

News International owner Rupert Murdoch and other media organisations, including UK newspapers and the Associated Press (AP), accuse NewsNow and other news aggregators such as Google and Microsoft, of being parasites and insist they should pay for access to news content. While Google quietly stopped indexing AP news shortly before Christmas, the News International action represents the first live bullets in what is destined to be a significant battle over the right to link and the basic building blocks of the Internet‘s interconnected world.

For the moment NewsNow seems to have been singled out. From where I sit, I wonder whether the relatively small UK-based operation represents a soft target for a posturing Mr Murdoch as he tries to find ways to bolster declining circulation and revenues at his major titles?

The really big target would be Google, but here the trade off between losing the opportunity to monetise traffic driven by the search giant while trying to unilaterally build online revenue from brand loyal readers sounds a little trickier. Is this a case of wanting it both ways, or will Murdoch eventually put his money where his mouth is and try and hold back the tide of internet traffic by hitting the big boys?

Come on chaps, play the game. The financial woes afflicting newspapers and their general inability to generate meaningful online revenues are not the fault of third party aggregators, who afterall, are driving traffic to their websites. The challenge here is to adapt and develop new business models that can thrive in a new digital world. Yes, it is not cheap to produce original news, but unfortunately it is not a rare commodity. Newspapers needs to find ways to engage with ther communities, not cast themselves adrift.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

EVENT — Essential free Online Content Marketing webcasts

Media and digital convergence offers myriad options and opportunities. Fine, if you know what you’re talking about that is. But for many, the emerging digital landscape is confusing. Those nice chaps at Those in Media have put together a programme of free webcasts and discussions on 20 January to help you all get the most out of your content.

Topics covered include tracking content ROI, publishing as the future of marketing, reading “digital body language” and managing content to avoid information overload.

These pages have previously mentioned another Those in Media initiative — the plans to host Mediastock in Europe in the summer. Sadly, as Brent Willen says, it was just too ambitious. So that idea is on hold, but other ideas including the webcasts and a tie up with AuthorsGlobe to produce Online Executive Education Sessions, with the first due on 4 February.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

NewsNow blocked by The Times, faces new restrictions in right to link

The battle of the aggregators and news providers deepened today, with UK service NewsNow.co.uk saying News International had barred it from being able to link to any content on Times Online.

The increasingly bitter confrontation over the right to link to freely available news content threatens to set precedents that fly in the face of the natural development of the Internet and the the World Wide Web where growth thrives on the easy exchange of information in an increasingly connected world.

News International owner Rupert Murdoch has had a real beef with news aggregators — including Google and Microsoft. They are, he says, parasites that steal premium content beyond what would be governed by fair use. NewsNow has been facing a concerted action from the major UK newspapers that want to stop commercial content aggregators linking to their news. Against this back drop are tumbling print newspaper revenues and titles struggling to monetise their content online.

Struan Bartlett, Managing Director and Chairman of NewsNow says his service has been singled out

“It is lamentable that News International has chosen to request we stop linking to their content and providing in-bound traffic and potential subscribers to the Times Online and right now it looks as though NewsNow has been singled out.

We note that no other major search engine has been blocked by NI in this manner. NewsNow is not fundamentally different to other news search engines that are part of the Internet infrastructure, such as Google News and Yahoo. Why block us and not them?”

At the end of last year, the UK national newspaper copyright body the Newspaper Licensing Agency (NLA), imposed a scheme that introduced the requirement to obtain permission and pay fees to circulate links to freely available web pages. The scheme has been referred to the Copyright Tribunal. NewsNow stopped offering links to UK newspapers as part of its premium subscription services, but continued to offer links in its free services.

My view is clear on this issue. Yes, online revenue comes from having content, but also, most importantly, generating as much traffic as possible. To use a simple analogy, if a road is blocked off traffic does not drive down to have a look, but instead seeks an alternate route to get to its destination. If newspapers are struggling to build online models that deliver healthly dollops of cash from general news content, the one thing they must do is look for ways to monetise traffic.

For the cynics among you, here is The Times online singing the praises of NewsNow in 2006.

NewsNow is also behind the Right2Link campaign.

Related articles by Zemanta

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

Musical interlude — Pixies, a class act in New York City

Black Francies and the Monkey Gone to Heaven Photo: Andy Soloman
Black Francies and the Monkey Gone to Heaven Photo: Andy Soloman

These pages have been a little quiet over the past couple of weeks as I have shifted my attention to other directions, namely visiting New York and getting to see those great icons of their age: the Pixies performing the seminal Doolittle and various “B sides”. Cracking stuff.

So, before normal service is resumed, and as a little bit of light refreshment mixed in with a dollop of nostalgia, I pay homage to the Pixies. Yes, their Doolittle tour is a cash cow but why the hell shouldn’t they be allowed to reap something more from a career that was stunted if not highly influential? In New York they performed four gigs on consecutive nights, and then as demand for tickets was so good they tacked on another 1am show on Thanksgiving eve.

And what was the result? Black Francis actually smiled and Kim Deal, looking every inch everyone’s favourite Mum, kept us entertained with a little refrained banter through the set. The last time I saw Black Francis perform was at a solo gig he did at a small, smokey and extremely crowded London venue back in 1991 or 1992. Back then I was a working photographer on assignment. The only place for me to perch was on the side of the stage. He took exception to his moment in the spotlight being invaded, stopped mid song, uttered some expletives and then told the crowd he wouldn’t continue until I was off the stage. I had no choice but to get subsumed in the mosh pit, cameras swinging. Back then he had attitude, but I reckon now he has also found a dose of gratitude.

Pixies at Hammerstein Ballroom in New York City Photo: Andy Soloman
Pixies at Hammerstein Ballroom in New York City Photo: Andy Soloman

Black Francis & Joey Santiago Photo: Andy Soloman
Black Francis & Joey Santiago Photo: Andy Soloman
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

VIDEO — $5 an hour to read online news (as seen in a 1981 TV report)

It’s always good to look back so we can understand just how far we have come. This 1981 TV news report was broadcast on KRON in the San Francisco Bay Area and showed how early home computer adopters were willing to pay $5 an hour (yes, $5 a hour) to consume their daily newspaper online. (Thanks to Graham Holliday (@noodlepie) for including this gem in his presentation “Publishing Kigali Wire”).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

eBay founder Pierre Omidyar dropping Twitter project for local news service

Image representing Pierre Omidyar as depicted ...
Pierre Omidyar, Image via CrunchBase

Billionaire eBay founder Pierre Omidyar has announced that he’s abandoning Ginx, his Twitter client project, in favour of developing a new online local news service in Hawaii where he lives.

Peer News, founded by Omidyar and fellow eBay stalwart Randy Ching in 2008, has advertised via Twitter for an editor and in a blog posting Omidyar said a lot of effort was now going into building the new service.

We have a lot of work to do before our public launch in early 2010. We’re focused on building a really talented team here in Honolulu. For our Ginx users, we’re sorry to let you know that we’ll be shutting down the service at the end of 2009. We learned a lot and greatly appreciate all the interaction and feedback from you over the past year. We’re huge fans of Twitter, so you will still see us online, but we want our developers focused on the new organization and news service.

Omidyar (@pierre on Twitter) said he had been interested in news for some time and that Peer News was founded with the goal of:

empowering citizens and encouraging greater civic participation through media. We believe that a strong democracy requires an engaged society supported by effective news reporting and analysis. And, we believe that this can be done in a profitable, sustainable way.

FireShot capture #055 - 'Pierre Omidyar (pierre) on Twitter' - twitter_com_pierreSo if you fancy applying to be the editor based in Honolulu, the details can be found here. Prospective candidates need to offer answers to two key questions impacting news today.

  1. In 100 words or less, when did you first realise that the Web was going to change journalism forever?
  2. In 100 words or less, what advice would you give the news industry?

News veteran Howard Weaver has been advising the Peer News team, and in a blog posting entitled “Looking toward one future for local civic journalism” he said:

The new venture intends to demonstrate that a digitally native, technologically fluent web organisation can profitably serve targeted readers who want sophisticated journalism focused on local civic affairs.

Local and regional newspapers have been hugely impacted in the crisis affecting journalism and changing reader and advertiser habits. Local publications have been closing in their scores as revenues and circulations plummet. The loss of a local newspaper closes a prime avenue for local accountability and democracy. It is a subject of heated debate, and stressed out newspaper executives will be watching Omidyar very closely to see if he can generate profits from online local news.

Related articles by Zemanta

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

Associated Press job losses update — AP layoff list

AP Associated Press LogoFurther to my posting earlier on job losses at US wire agency the Associated Press, Gawker has been keeping a running total of job losses in both the United States and in news bureaux elsewhere in the world.

The list is being constantly updated as more information and tip offs become available.

The full AP layoff list can be found here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

VIDEO — Socialnomics presents compelling evidence of the power of Social Media

If you needed any convincing, this latest video “Social Media ROI: Socialnomics” by Socialnomics author Erik Qualman paints a convincing case. Memo to all companies and businesses everywhere: Ignore at your peril.

As Qualman says on his Socialnomics – Social Media Blog:

This article and video have been put together with the hopes of it being a viable tool for those with a vision to get those seated in the back row to stand up and see the social media light.

The latest offering is packed full of bold stats, so I’d advise some degree of caution in blindly accepting the detail. However, what cannot be disputed is social media isn’t just flexing its muscles, it is fast becoming the most powerful technological revolution to sweep the globe. It is critical for the power of the social media discontinuity to be fully understood. Those that do will prosper.

The video follows on from Qualman’s hugely successful YouTube video from a few months ago called “Socialnomics: Social Media Revolution” which has over million views.

If you haven’t seen it (and it is essential viewing), you can find the original within my posting “What Grandma didn’t say: Social Media is here to stay” or here is the alternative shorter version:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

Associated Press lays off news staff as cost cutting hits home

The Associated Press Building in New York City...
Image via Wikipedia

The Associated Press has laid off “dozens” of news staff as part of the agency‘s bid to reduce staffing costs by 10% this year.

The moves come as the 163-year-old cooperative wire agency has grappled with falling revenues, mutiny from its members and well-publicised battles against search engines and aggregators that it accuses of making money off the back of its services.

While US news media was buzzing yesterday as first word of the cuts began to filter out, the AP — which prides itself on fast breaking news — was itself uncharacteristically slow in reporting what was happening.

When it eventually came, the AP story didn’t say how many staff were being laid off, but the News Media Guild, which represents around 1,300 employees in the US, said as of Tuesday evening 38 Guild-covered reporters, editors and photographers had been told they were no longer required. It dubbed the day “Black Tuesday”.

AP said its cost cutting goal was set late last year as it prepared to lower fees for newspapers and broadcasters that had been hit by recession and the shift of advertising to the Internet.

The AP story said:

AP’s revenue is expected to fall about 6 percent this year to roughly $700 million.

Hoping to minimize layoffs, the AP imposed a hiring freeze late last year and offered early retirement packages to longtime employees over the summer. About 100 opted for those packages.

It’s been a tough year for the news business in the United States. Newspaper circulation across the country plunged by an average 10.6% in the six months to 30 September, while earlier this month the struggling Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times and other Tribune Co newspapers planned to do an AP cold turkey for a week as part of a test to see if all ties with the news agency can be severed next year.

The AP has promised members rate reductions averaging around 20%, but with its content perceived to be increasingly less relevant and the costs for the service harder to sustain, many question what the future holds for the news agency.

AP supremeo Tom Curley has been aggressively fighting (alongside Rupert Murdoch) giant news search services such as Google and Microsoft saying they should be made to pay for AP content. Curley says sites such as Google have reaped a fortune off AP articles, photos and video without paying fair compensation.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz

Rock’n'roller Josh Tyrangiel to leave Time.com, pogo over to lead BusinessWeek

Josh Tyrangiel
Rock’n'roller Tyrangiel to head BusinessWeek

Michael Bloomberg’s new play thing, the top (but loss-making) BusinessWeek magazine will have 37-year-old Josh Tyrangiel as its new editor, once the acquisition from McGraw-Hill completes in December.

In his “On Media” blog within the BusinessWeek site, Tom Lowry wrote today:

By selecting the 37-year-old Tyrangiel who is not a business journalist per se, Bloomberg clearly wants a leader for BusinessWeek who is not only a highly-regarded editor but someone who has demonstrated he knows how to reach a wider array of readers in both print and online.

Tyrangiel, a deputy managing editor at Time magazine and the editor of Time.com, is actually a bit of a rock’n'roller. Prior to taking the reins at Time.com he was the magazine’s music critic and also wrote for publications such as Vibe and Rolling Stone. While he may never have interviewed Bernard Madoff or Warren Buffet, he can count Bruce Springsteen, George Clooney and the Dixie Chicks among his interviewees.

Bloomberg’s chief content officer and former Time Inc. editor in chief Norman Pearlstine, was reported by Lowry as saying:

“I saw Josh in a number of leadership positions as he took on increasing responsibilities at TIME.”

He continued:

“Working closely with him …. I came to appreciate his intelligence, curiosity, energy, and integrity. Josh is recognized within Time Inc. and its parent, Time Warner Inc., as an ‘editor’s editor’ and a natural leader. His understanding of the ways in which print and online publications can work together will serve Bloomberg well as we expand our consumer media offerings.”

Changes have been sweeping through BusinessWeek since the sale to Bloomberg was announced last month. Jobs have gone and staff fear the venerable old magazine will become a promotional tool for Bloomberg, with the real business being done online. With his strong online credentials, Tyrangiel, who will replace Stephen Adler, may well help confirm those fears. His tenure at Time.com saw web traffic soar from 400 million page views in 2006 to what could be an estimated 1.8 billion page views this year, Lowry wrote.

Top Time Editor To Become BusinessWeek’s New Editor

Posted by: Tom Lowry on November 17

Josh Tyrangiel .jpg
Josh Tyrangiel, a deputy managing editor at Time magazine and the top editor of its online operations, will become the first editor of a Bloomberg-owned BusinessWeek. The acquisition, announced Oct. 13, is expected to close in early December.

By selecting the 37-year-old Tyrangiel who is not a business journalist per se, Bloomberg clearly wants a leader for BusinessWeek who is not only a highly-regarded editor but someone who has demonstrated he knows how to reach a wider array of readers in both print and online. A major reason Bloomberg LP executives pursued BusinessWeek was to reach a broader audience beyond Wall Street and the professional investor communities.

“I saw Josh in a number of leadership positions as he took on increasing responsibilities at TIME,” says Norman Pearlstine, Bloomberg’s chief content officer and a former editor-in-chief of Time Inc., Time’s parent. “Working closely with him …. I came to appreciate his intelligence, curiosity, energy, and integrity. Josh is recognized within Time Inc. and its parent, Time Warner Inc., as an ‘editor’s editor’ and a natural leader. His understanding of the ways in which print and online publications can work together will serve Bloomberg well as we expand our consumer media offerings.”

In some media circles, Tyrangiel was considered a leading candidate to succeed Time managing editor Richard Stengel. According to sources, Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes was so impressed with Tyrangiel that he tried to recruit him to be come the editor of CNN.com, the online arm of the 24-hour cable news channel, but Time Inc.’s current editor-in-chief John Huey intervened and convinced Tyrangiel to stay at Time with the promise that he might one day succeed Stengel.

During his tenure at Time.com, Tyrangiel boosted the Web site’s traffic from 400 million page views in 2006 to what could be an estimated 1.8 billion page views this year. Previous to Time, Tyrangiel worked at Rolling Stone and Vibe magazines and served as a news producer at MTV.

“Josh Tyrangiel will be a tremendous asset as we build the market presence of BusinessWeek backed by Bloomberg’s global multimedia news organization, to create the most compelling business news for the most sought-after readers.,” said Bloomberg L.P. President Daniel Doctoroff.

Tyrangiel will report to Pearlstine, who in turn will report on editorial matters to Matthew Winkler, Bloomberg’s editor-in-chief. “Norm and Josh are the ideal team to deliver a terrific business magazine that brings the most trusted, most influential and most important news to a global audience of thought leaders,” said Winkler.

Tyrangiel will work alongside BusinessWeek executive editors Ellen Pollock and John Byrne and managing editor Ciro Scotti. Pearlstine announced earlier that they would continue in their roles at the magazine. Tyrangiel succeeds Stephen J. Adler, who announced his resignation as editor-in-chief on Oct. 20.

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Blogsvine
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio UK
  • YahooBuzz
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Copyright © Andy Soloman
Global Journalism and New Media

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress