Tag BBC

BBC begins consultation on revised editorial guidelines

The BBC Trust, the governing body of state-funded broadcaster has begun consultations on its proposed revised editorial guidelines that intend to synchronise its broadcast and online editorial policies.

While aiming to safeguard independence and editorial integrity, the guidelines require mandatory referrals to senior management if any news story making serious allegations relies on a single source. Further, in a move that could rein in the ability of BBC correspondents nothing could be written

But it is in the area of language and the use of strong swearwords where the biggest changes are being made. While not altogether banned, their use must be justified and they must not be used when children are listening or viewing before the 9pm watershed. The strongest language, and therefore the words most likely to cause offense, need to be approved:

5.4.24 Any proposal to use the strongest language (cunt, motherfucker and fuck or its derivatives) must be referred to and approved by the relevant Output Controller, who should consider the editorial justification. Chief Adviser Editorial Policy may also be consulted.

The BBC has suffered a string of mishaps and outraged criticism at the behaviour of some of its presenters on air, the most notorious of which was when Russell Brand and Jonathon Ross left a telephone message for actor Andrew Sachs (Manuel in classic hit comedy Fawlty  Towers) that caused wide offense.

The consultation period is open from today until 24 December. Read the full draft guidelines here.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


BBC Trust to unveil tighter editorial guidelines

The BBC Trust, the body that governs the state-funded BBC, is set to unveil proposals today to revise its editorial guidelines covering all areas of broadcasting as well as setting down guidance on how the corporation handles political controversy, phone-ins, text voting and swearing after the 9pm watershed.

Unusually, the proposals are to be put out for a 12-week period of public consultation in a move, The Times said, intended to help restore public confidence.

The proposals will also target safeguarding the accuracy and impartiality of BBC factual output.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Economist to build website paywall higher for archive content

The Economist is to expand its archive pay wall from Tuesday 13 October to all content more than 90 days old from the existing one year barrier. Online readers will continue to be able to access the last three months and the latest issue for free, as well as blogs, audio-visual and other sections of the site.

The Economist online is to expand paid subscription only access

The Economist online is to expand paid subscription only access

The Economist has been somewhat insulated from the woes affecting other traditional news publications, with the various versions of the “weekly newspaper” delivering a combined net circulation per issue of 1.4 million copies and claims four million readers globally.

Ben Edwards, publisher of The Economist’s website, was quoted by Media Week as saying the brand online had expanded beyond the print issue to become “a hub for intelligent discussion and debate”.

He added: “Our intention is to continue to develop intelligent discussion as a free, advertising-supported experience, but to charge for the weekly magazine online.”

The online subscription costs £50 a year, or about half of the combined print edition plus online package.

It can be argued that The Economist is in a better position than most when it comes to charging for its online content. It’s model is unlikely to signal much hope for newspapers wracked with declining print subscriptions and display sales. It is not their archives that will deliver the revenues needed, but the breaking news and most current content.

Possibly part of the argument here is that The Economist is doing this simply because it can. It’s coming from a position of strength and is seeking to exploit that. Yes, its display revenues are down massively, but its print versions been riding a wave of success and it has grown its reach into the social media sphere massively. Not bad for a high brow rag.

The recent Top 25 Digital Influencers in News & Politics report from digital marketing consultancy Sparxoo placed The Economist at number 19:

Just ahead of Newsweek, The Economist is surprisingly competitive in the social category. The Economist does very well on Facebook (placing sixth) and breaks into the top 10 most backlinked sites. In fact, the Economist has more fans than CNN, MSNBC, the BBC and the Huffington Post combined, with 158k.

Is this offering a golden key to a brighter publishing future? Economist editor John Micklethwait believes so:

I’m more optimistic about the media industry in the last two or three months,” he told the The Gazette in Montreal last week. “I think the message has got through that people need to pay for content.”

Yes, The Economist display revenues have slumped, but these have been countered by growth in print subscription revenues and a savvy approach to social media and the web.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


BBC growth a “threat” to democracy says top Tory

Jeremy Hunt, the UK’s shadow  culture secretary (that means that if the Conservative Party win the election next year he will likely be Culture Minister), has said the BBC‘s growth represents a threat to democracy and must be reined in with curbs to its websites, executive pay and commercial activities.

In an interview with The Guardian published today, Hunt said if the BBC failed to act on a voluntary basis he would use his role in the licence fee renewal process to push for action.

While the BBC is funded by British television licence fees, unlike state broadcasters in other countries, it is editorially independent. However, as local and regional newspapers have folded in recent months the BBC has come under increasing scrutiny.

I admire the BBC immensely. It is a national treasure and something the British people deeply cherish. It’s a tough call. No matter how good the BBC services are — and these are delivered without the commercial pressures other organisations face — it is a  state-owned corporation. If private services fail, people will be increasingly pushed to the BBC for their news. This is not healthy for democracy. But, BBC bashing has also become something of a popular sport in recent years, especially by competing media groups seeking to gain the upper hand, or politicians looking to provoke public anger over supposed profligacy within the BBC with taxpayers’ money.

I can’t but help feel, Hunt may well be playing to the gallery with an eye on the election. But while the sincerity of politicians in the UK is often called into question, his words will be welcomed by Rupert Murdoch’s News International, which has called for the BBC to be curbed in order to give struggling publishers a better commercial chance.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


AOP says about 70% of members charge or intend charging for content

A poll from the UK Association of Online Publishers (AOP) says about half its members currently charge for some or all content on their websites, while a further 20% said they were planning to begin charging in the next 12 months. Big change from a similar poll two years ago when 54% of AOP members said they had no plans to charge for online content.

In the AOP 2009 Content & Trends Census, association members were asked about digital opportunities, threats and trends, as well as paid and free content; user-generated content (UGC); social media; content delivery mechanisms; mobile sites and mobile applications.

Not surprisingly, the biggest opportunities were seen in

Mobile Web (85%), UGC (75%), High speed broadband (75%), Community/social networking (73%) and behavioural targeting (73%).

And the threats:

The economy (70%), Competitors (53%), BBC (50%), Google (38%) and Government and legal restrictions (35%).

Lee Baker, Director of AOP, was quoted as saying:

“We’ve all been talking about a tough year for industry and particularly for publishers, but again our Members show their ability to adapt and take on new challenges in the form of exploiting new formats. A strong vote for Mobile and Mobile Apps is encouraging for the industry as a whole; and use of Twitter is a particularly interesting development in terms of use of new mechanisms to publish content.”

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Copyright © Andy Soloman
Global Journalism and New Media

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress