Image via Wikipedia
Following on from my earlier post that The Times Online had barred aggregator NewsNow.co.uk from crawling its website, it seems News International as a whole has the bit firmly between its teeth and has also banned the linking service from crawling any of its newspaper sites including including The Sun Online and the News of the World.
The Guardian reported News International as saying:
“We’ve been in communication with NewsNow for several months. We asked them to remove our content repeatedly from their indexing,” said a News International spokesperson. “Now, we will update our files accordingly for all our titles.”
“NewsNow has been using Times Online content as part of its paid-for, commercial as well as free services. They have continued to do so despite our direct requests for them to stop. As a result, we have taken the decision to disallow their indexing of our content,” the company said in a statement.
“News International makes a significant investment in journalism and we believe that it is entirely appropriate for us to ask that our rights are respected. NewsNow has acknowledged that they require our permission to use our content and, in the absence of our permission, has ceased to do so.
News International owner Rupert Murdoch and other media organisations, including UK newspapers and the Associated Press (AP), accuse NewsNow and other news aggregators such as Google and Microsoft, of being parasites and insist they should pay for access to news content. While Google quietly stopped indexing AP news shortly before Christmas, the News International action represents the first live bullets in what is destined to be a significant battle over the right to link and the basic building blocks of the Internet‘s interconnected world.
For the moment NewsNow seems to have been singled out. From where I sit, I wonder whether the relatively small UK-based operation represents a soft target for a posturing Mr Murdoch as he tries to find ways to bolster declining circulation and revenues at his major titles?
The really big target would be Google, but here the trade off between losing the opportunity to monetise traffic driven by the search giant while trying to unilaterally build online revenue from brand loyal readers sounds a little trickier. Is this a case of wanting it both ways, or will Murdoch eventually put his money where his mouth is and try and hold back the tide of internet traffic by hitting the big boys?
Come on chaps, play the game. The financial woes afflicting newspapers and their general inability to generate meaningful online revenues are not the fault of third party aggregators, who afterall, are driving traffic to their websites. The challenge here is to adapt and develop new business models that can thrive in a new digital world. Yes, it is not cheap to produce original news, but unfortunately it is not a rare commodity. Newspapers needs to find ways to engage with ther communities, not cast themselves adrift.
Related articles by Zemanta
- News International to block NewsNow from all its websites (guardian.co.uk)
- Right to crawl vs right to link (malcolmcoles.co.uk)
- Sun blocks NewsNow from crawling its site (malcolmcoles.co.uk)
- The Empire strikes back or the old order’s attempt to draw a close to the age of free (socialmediatoday.com)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=f4cdc0ee-0534-40ce-a275-2db4b46ed073)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=fd5296e8-7777-447d-a36c-6baf290f8f4c)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f1dfd177-6b24-43fb-8cab-22a769b6ce93)
In a Twitter age when real time means (almost) exactly that, the 
In remarks made at the 
